Sunday, January 25, 2009

And yet, over 58 million people still voted Republican

I'm trying not to get caught up too much in the Obama-mania - I mean yeah he's super cool and all but whatever, he's still just a career politician - but every now and then I remember why we love the guy so much.

Remember the guy he replaced? From the Washington Post comes this early piece on the Bush legacy:

Guantanamo Case Files in Disarray

President Obama's plans to expeditiously determine the fates of about 245 terrorism suspects held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and quickly close the military prison there were set back last week when incoming legal and national security officials -- barred until the inauguration from examining classified material on the detainees -- discovered that there were no comprehensive case files on many of them.

Instead, they found that information on individual prisoners is "scattered throughout the executive branch," a senior administration official said. The executive order Obama signed Thursday orders the prison closed within one year, and a Cabinet-level panel named to review each case separately will have to spend its initial weeks and perhaps months scouring the corners of the federal government in search of relevant material.

Several former Bush administration officials agreed that the files are incomplete and that no single government entity was charged with pulling together all the facts and the range of options for each prisoner. They said that the CIA and other intelligence agencies were reluctant to share information, and that the Bush administration's focus on detention and interrogation made preparation of viable prosecutions a far lower priority.

mmmmmmmmmm yes i love it tell me more about how the american government shit all over human rights in the name of freedom, as a disaffected twenty-something leftist irony is my lifeblood

although i'm sure administration officials had a really good reason to do something like that!

But other former officials took issue with the criticism and suggested that the new team has begun to appreciate the complexity and dangers of the issue and is looking for excuses.

After promising quick solutions, one former senior official said, the Obama administration is now "backpedaling and trying to buy time" by blaming its predecessor. Unless political appointees decide to overrule the recommendations of the career bureaucrats handling the issue under both administrations, he predicted, the new review will reach the same conclusion as the last: that most of the detainees can be neither released nor easily tried in this country.

"All but about 60 who have been approved for release," assuming countries can be found to accept them, "are either high-level al-Qaeda people responsible for 9/11 or bombings, or were high-level Taliban or al-Qaeda facilitators or money people," said the former official who, like others, insisted on anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to reporters about such matters. He acknowledged that he relied on Pentagon assurances that the files were comprehensive and in order rather than reading them himself.

i literally can't even add commentary to this it's like an immaculate satire, like bush created a parody so perfect it self-actualised

"are you crazy we can't release them, they're terrorist leaders! what? no i haven't actually seen any physical evidence that would indicate anything i'm saying is even remotely true but the army told me they did and i'm a big gullible idiot"

Obama officials said they want to make their own judgments.

"The consensus among almost everyone is that the current system is not in our national interest and not sustainable," another senior official said. But "it's clear that we can't clear up this issue overnight" partly because the files "are not comprehensive."

Charles D. "Cully" Stimson, who served as deputy assistant defense secretary for detainee affairs in 2006-2007, said he had persistent problems in attempts to assemble all information on individual cases. Threats to recommend the release or transfer of a detainee were often required, he said, to persuade the CIA to "cough up a sentence or two."

A second former Pentagon official said most individual files are heavily summarized dossiers that do not contain the kind of background and investigative work that would be put together by a federal prosecution team. He described "regular food fights" among different parts of the government over information-sharing on the detainees.

A CIA spokesman denied that the agency had not been "forthcoming" with detainee information, saying that such suggestions were "simply wrong" and that "we have worked very closely with other agencies to share what we know" about the prisoners. While denying there had been problems, one intelligence official said the Defense Department was far more likely to be responsible for any information lapses, since it had initially detained and interrogated most of the prisoners and had been in charge of them at the prison.

cia spokesman then denied grass is green, existence of cia

Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said that the Defense Department would cooperate fully in the review.

"Fundamentally, we believe that the individual files on each detainee are comprehensive and sufficiently organized," Morrell said. He added that "in many cases, there will be thousands of pages of documents . . . which makes a comprehensive assessment a time-consuming endeavor."

"Not all the documents are physically located in one place," Morrell said, but most are available through a database.

"The main point here is that there are lots of records, and we are prepared to make them available to anybody who needs to see them as part of this review."

pretend this sentence is a witty crack about the term "military intelligence"

There have been indications from within and outside the government for some time, however, that evidence and other materials on the Guantanamo prisoners were in disarray, even though most of the detainees have been held for years.

Justice Department lawyers responding in federal courts to defense challenges over the past six months have said repeatedly that the government was overwhelmed by the sudden need to assemble material after Supreme Court rulings giving detainees habeas corpus and other rights.

activist judges are ruining america. (republicans believe that statement is true fyi)

In one federal filing, the Justice Department said that "the record . . . is not simply a collection of papers sitting in a box at the Defense Department. It is a massive undertaking just to produce the record in this one case." In another filing, the department said that "defending these cases requires an intense, inter-agency coordination of efforts. None of the relevant agencies, however, was prepared to handle this volume of habeas cases on an expedited basis."

Evidence gathered for military commission trials is in disarray, according to some former officials, who said military lawyers lacked the trial experience to prosecute complex international terrorism cases.

In a court filing this month, Darrel Vandeveld, a former military prosecutor at Guantanamo who asked to be relieved of his duties, said evidence was "strewn throughout the prosecution offices in desk drawers, bookcases packed with vaguely-labeled plastic containers, or even simply piled on the tops of desks."

He said he once accidentally found "crucial physical evidence" that "had been tossed in a locker located at Guantanamo and promptly forgotten."

hahaha awesome

I think the absolute best part of the Obama administration will be all the great things it will teach us about just how staggeringly incompetent and absurd the Bush era actually was.

It's really weird living in a post-Bush world.

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

A Financial Katrina

This is a lecture given by Dr. David Harvey of the City University of New York on the global financial crisis we're currently embroiled in.

Harvey has been studying and teaching Marx's Kapital for roughly four decades (his lessons are actually available for free on his site) so his interpretation is definitely unorthodox but it's a very interesting perspective on how/why all of this is occurring and what it actually means for ordinary individuals.

And don't worry, he's not just spewing a bunch of academic Marxian jargon - it's all in the plain English of high finance, so it shouldn't be any less comprehensible than ROBTV or CNN's market coverage/investment advice.

~link

----
This lecture was delivered on October 29 2008 at the panel discussion for The Disruption: Left Interpretations of the Financial Crisis at the CUNY Graduate Centre.

Monday, January 5, 2009

The Special Case That is Israel

This is an interesting piece from 24-year old Danish Socialist MP Johanne Schmidt-Nielsen on the current humanitarian crisis in Gaza that pretty much says everything that I would have to say on the topic.

The rhetoric could be toned down a little bit in a few places, but other than that it's spot on.

What do you think?

------------------------------

The Special Case That Is Israel
Johannes Schmidt-Nielsen

On Saturday Israel initiated the most violent attack on Palestinian territory in several years. With the help of high-tech F16 jets and Apache helicopters Israel bombed the densely populated Gaza Strip, where 1.5 million people live in total slums. The area is roughly the size of Langeland island.

It is nothing new that Israeli policies kill Palestinians, the horrible attack on Saturday simply marks another "high point". In the previous months Gaza has been subject to what the Palestinians call silent deaths. The two-year-old Israeli blockade of the Gaza Strip means that hundreds of Palestinians have lost their lives. Cause of death: Lack of basic medicines such as insulin, combined with massive food shortages. Especially the old and sick have buckled under the blockade.

According to the Israeli government, Saturday's attack is simply a defensive reaction meant to force HAMAS and other Palestinian militant groups to cease their rocket attacks directed at southern Israeli cities, that have barely hit anything. While the Palestinian attacks are described as inhumane acts of terrorism, the much deadlier Israeli attacks are portrayed as attempts to establish peace and quiet. It is a strange form of reverse logic: An occupied people is labelled terorists, whereas the occupiers are categorized as democratic peacemakers.

And this sort of logic is only given the time of day because the West has awarded Israel a unique status. While other occupying forces have been subject to both sanctions and invasions from the international community, Israel has been able to keep up their occupation of Palestinian territory for 40 years. Not even Israel's intentional and well-planned colonization of Palestinian lands through hundreds of settlements has been seriously condemned by the international community. On the contrary Israel is given special treatment, for example in terms of trade—and now the EU is planning to strengthen cooperation with Israel.

The West's double standard and disregard for the Palestinians' basic rights are not just a tragedy for the Palestinians. It is a tragedy for the world. The continued occupation and constant humiliation of the Palestinians is without a doubt one of the most effective methods of creating support for reactionary, Islamist HAMAS and terrorist organizations like Al-Qaeda. They can rightly refer to the hollowness of the West's talk of democracy and human rights, and thereby co-opt the despair that is so widespread in the Arab world.

The most tragic thing is that a permanent peace in reality requires only a few, small gestures on Israel's behalf. A large majority of Palestinians have given up the claim to their original homeland and now only demand that Israel give back the areas occupied since 1967, as well as a solution for Palestinian refugees.

Israel is 100% reliant on American military and economic support and trade with the EU. Therefore, a lasting peace (favouring both Palestinians and Israelis!) could be obtained the day there was political will to pressure Israel economically. For some reason that just doesn't happen—for the special case that is Israel.